Recording Engineering & Production: Making records better, not just louder and cheaper. The brightest minds from the creative and scientific world of audio discuss the elements of audio production that interest you most.
Barry Hufker Messages: 6394 Registered: October 2004 Location: between heaven and hell
Platinum Member
Thanks Rick. Now I'm "in the know". It's so hard to keep up with all the news and all the acronyms.
http://www.hufkerrecording.com
Torture “is basically subject to perception,” CIA counterterrorism lawyer Jonathan Fredman told a group of military and intelligence officials gathered at the U.S.-run detention camp in Cuba on Oct. 2, 2002, according to minutes of the meeting. “If the detainee dies, you’re doing it wrong.”
J.J. Blair Messages: 10759 Registered: May 2004 Location: by the sea & sand
Diamond Member
Tomas Danko wrote on Thu, 08 May 2008 07:43
As far as EQing a vocal track recorded using the TLM49, I have to say the sound falls apart quite quickly once you start processing it with EQ. Especially the treble. It just goes into mush up there, and the transients get weird. I started using the TLM103 over the TLM49 here just for that reason alone, before I went to other mics.
Yes, it does fall apart. I was talking about adding the low end that doesn't exist, or pulling out some of those mids that make the mic hard to listen to on piano or on OHs.
And as far as saying "it's a nice vocal mic" or whatever, I'm being generous. temporary webpage
They say the heart of Rock & Roll is still beating, which is amazing if you consider all the blow it's done over the years.
"The Internet enables pompous blowhards to interact with other pompous blowhards in a big circle jerk of pomposity." - Bill Maher
jensenmann Messages: 52 Registered: April 2007 Location: Karlsruhe, Germany
Member
Nobody has heard this mike but everybody's already throwing shit on it? What attitude is this? This really makes me wonder.
Regarding the initial question" TLM67....why?":
Marketing
Did anybody ever wonder why Telefunken is now based in USA??? Why they call their mikes as the call them? Nobody would have given a shit on a XYZ M0-8/15 microphone made from whoever in USA. Give it a historically meaningfull name and everybody cares. And so is Neumann doing. Plain and simple marketing.Jens
J.J. Blair Messages: 10759 Registered: May 2004 Location: by the sea & sand
Diamond Member
jensenmann wrote on Fri, 09 May 2008 08:55
Did anybody ever wonder why Telefunken is now based in USA???
Telefunken is NOT based in the USA. Telefunken USA has nothing to do with the original Telefunken. The original Telefunken does not exist anymore. Chrysler Daimler, who owns Telefunken, let the rights to the name in North America lapse, and Toni jumped on it. Kind of industrious on his part, if you ask me.
But you are right about the historical references in terms of bullshit marketing. It's genius from a business standpoint. However, I think it IS fairly safe to assume the mic will sound like crap compared to the original. I have yet to hear a transformerless PCB mic that thought sounded warm, or had any personality. temporary webpage
They say the heart of Rock & Roll is still beating, which is amazing if you consider all the blow it's done over the years.
"The Internet enables pompous blowhards to interact with other pompous blowhards in a big circle jerk of pomposity." - Bill Maher
Nobody has heard this mike but everybody's already throwing shit on it? What attitude is this? This really makes me wonder.
Regarding the initial question" TLM67....why?":
Marketing
Did anybody ever wonder why Telefunken is now based in USA??? Why they call their mikes as the call them? Nobody would have given a shit on a XYZ M0-8/15 microphone made from whoever in USA. Give it a historically meaningfull name and everybody cares. And so is Neumann doing. Plain and simple marketing.
The Tele USA gets the same criticism for the same type of "marketing" and they are "trying" to repro the actual mic.
End of day, It is nearly impossible that the new neumann will be great. Remember they tout it to sound like a 67...
I know it seems harsh to call it DOA but come on we've all heard lots of these things right?
Will it be closer to the other TLM's Or the Vintage U67...
Like I wrote earlier if it sounds good it will be an accident.
jensenmann Messages: 52 Registered: April 2007 Location: Karlsruhe, Germany
Member
J.J. Blair wrote on Fri, 09 May 2008 18:14
Telefunken is NOT based in the USA. Telefunken USA has nothing to do with the original Telefunken. The original Telefunken does not exist anymore. Chrysler Daimler, who owns Telefunken, let the rights to the name in North America lapse, and Toni jumped on it. Kind of industrious on his part, if you ask me.
You see: Marketing, that?s what I wanted to say.
Still I would not judge or write something bad about it before I have heard the mike. Who knows, maybe we will all be buying this mike for some reason. You never know Jens
Jay Kadis Messages: 1244 Registered: April 2007 Location: SF Bay Area
Platinum Member
I use the TLM193 a lot and like it. I'll wait to hear the TLM67 before I criticize it.
There's evidently a market for the new breed of Neumanns and Telefunkens even though they don't sound like the vintage models. I really doubt everyone at Neumann is a complete idiot.-JK
TLM 49 owner here. I'll tell you a story. Every time I visit my daughter in New York...did I mention she attends Columbia University....I take a taxi to B & H at 420 Ninth Avenue. One this one occasion I was in the market for a new mic for the studio. They have this neat Microphone and preamp isolation room with all available mics lined up in a row with headphones so you can select any combination of preamp and microphone. I did my thing and after listening to several low end and high end mics, I came to this one and it was an "ah-haaa!" moment for me. I told the salesperson to wrap this one up immediately. I was so excited. I hurried to the cashier and gave them my debt card only to find out they wouldn't accept it because the secret 3 digit code number on the back could not be read because I had used the damn thing so much. I was pissed. I ended up buying the mic from Sweetwater who matched their price of $1278, I believe it was. I wish I hadn't waited so long to buy a new mic. Vocals sound so much nicer with that thing.Studio 89
Harland Messages: 495 Registered: September 2004 Location: Vancouver BC
Active Member
rankus wrote on Thu, 08 May 2008 22:08
Barry Hufker wrote on Thu, 08 May 2008 13:21
What are "TNC" mics?
Hey Barry, this is the brand name of the mics (and other gear) that Terry and Chance are having made up in China for the big group buy... (Terry "N" Chance)
When is said big group buy and which type of mic is it this time and is it still possible to get in on it?
J.J. Blair Messages: 10759 Registered: May 2004 Location: by the sea & sand
Diamond Member
It's not a bad mic for $1,200. But there are better, IMHO. The discontinued Langevin CR3A beats it on every source, and that used to cost $400 out the door.
Did you try the Brauner's while you were listening to other mics? My experience ith the Phantom was that it was rich sounding. Definitely not how I would describe the TLM49.
I'd be shocked if the mic cost them more than $400 to manufacture.temporary webpage
They say the heart of Rock & Roll is still beating, which is amazing if you consider all the blow it's done over the years.
"The Internet enables pompous blowhards to interact with other pompous blowhards in a big circle jerk of pomposity." - Bill Maher
J.J. Blair Messages: 10759 Registered: May 2004 Location: by the sea & sand
Diamond Member
compasspnt wrote on Fri, 09 May 2008 11:17
I think everyone here who is expecting a less than stellar microphone would be thrilled to be wrong about this.
I know I would be.
But it is fairly easy to predict what will happen when everyone hears this.
Those who have and/or use a lot of great vintage microphones will not be amused.
We shall see.
Funny you say that. You know that one company that makes the mics that look exactly like the super expensive vintage ones? they have a quote on their ads and their site from a guy who owns a ton of those mics, where he says, "It's everything I hoped it would be." Apparently said company is too obtuse to understand what I would bet money on what really means: "I'm glad they are not as good as the real ones that I own." temporary webpage
They say the heart of Rock & Roll is still beating, which is amazing if you consider all the blow it's done over the years.
"The Internet enables pompous blowhards to interact with other pompous blowhards in a big circle jerk of pomposity." - Bill Maher