| Mini massive M7 and K47 test [message #340623] |
Mon, 12 May 2008 11:10  |
 |
Martin Kantola Messages: 255 Registered: June 2005 |
Active Member |
|
|
Thought I'd do a little test with the following capsules on the same body and grille, and then share the sound files with you people:
- Neumann Berlin PVC M7
- Gefell PVC M7
- Thiersch rebuilt PVC M7
- Thiersch built PE M7
- Dale Ulan built PE M7
- Wagner rebuilt PE M7
- Thiersch rebuilt K47
- Neumann K47
Please let me know if you have any suggestions for the test. Any ideas welcome.
Martin
This message may have been edited by the moderator without my knowledge.
|
|
|
|
| Re: Mini massive M7 and K47 test [message #341338 is a reply to message #340623 ] |
Wed, 14 May 2008 10:24   |
 |
Arf! Mastering Messages: 788 Registered: June 2004 Location: New York City |
Gold Member |
|
|
In any test, repeatability is certainly important. (But) using a speaker as a source can be flawed in that that coloration of the speaker will work for or against the coloration in the mic.
Custom drivers are used as calibration sources in mic testing but, IMO, are not as valuable in making subjective judgements.
... With all the variables that surround mic testing - bodies, capsules, positioning, performance differences, it seems that mic evaluation is more an art than a science.
"Large signals can actually be counterproductive. If I scream at you over the phone, you don’t hear me better. If I shine a bright light in your eyes, you don’t see better.”
Dr. C.T. Rubin, biomechanical engineer
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Mini massive M7 and K47 test [message #365994 is a reply to message #365903 ] |
Thu, 21 August 2008 13:39   |
 |
Klaus Heyne Messages: 2148 Registered: April 2004 |
Platinum Member |
|
|
Martin,
My main job in running this forum is to provide information and opportunities for inquiry on a level that a working professional can make time for.
Until I stepped in, we had in this thread four pages of posts but still haven't had a chance to hearing your tests.
Your idea of comparing many versions of the same type of capsule is wonderful. But I let you know repeatedly that I thought we had digested enough of the preliminaries and that it was time for you to share the results.
I have no doubt that the now condensed version of the preliminaries will be appreciated when someone reads this thread in a year or two. Now we have plenty of space to discuss the actual test results. I promise to let the exchanges flow, once you finally get around to posting sound files.
Best regards,
Klaus Heyne
German Masterworks
www.GermanMasterworks.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Mini massive M7 and K47 test [message #367702 is a reply to message #367616 ] |
Thu, 28 August 2008 20:00   |
rodabod Messages: 207 Registered: December 2005 Location: London |
Active Member |
|
|
That's great, Martin.
I'll hold back any comments until people have had a chance to listen blind.
May I ask what year/month you bought your Dale M7? Just wondering if it is an earlier or later revision.
Cheers,
Roddy
Roddy Bell
BBC / Siemens
|
|
|
|
| Re: Mini massive M7 and K47 test [message #368202 is a reply to message #340623 ] |
Sat, 30 August 2008 15:04   |
kats Messages: 725 Registered: September 2005 |
Gold Member |
|
|
I only listened to the male voice and thought that capsule 3 stood shoulders above the others - a little more presence that added a bit more excitement. I'm sure the difference would be more than slight if I was there.
Tony Katsabanis
|
|
|
| Re: Mini massive M7 and K47 test [message #368204 is a reply to message #340623 ] |
Sat, 30 August 2008 15:09   |
kats Messages: 725 Registered: September 2005 |
Gold Member |
|
|
Oh just checked out the acoustics - quite a difference between Gefell's PVC and Neumann's...
Was that a new Gefell PVC? It didn't seem to have the body.
Tony Katsabanis
|
|
|