|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Peluso mics? [message #339863 is a reply to message #335614 ] |
Thu, 08 May 2008 15:25   |
Steve Hudson Messages: 482 Registered: November 2004 Location: Austin, Texas USofA |
Active Member |
|
|
I read the Barry Rudolph review of the Peluso 22 47SE in this month's Mix:
http://mixonline.com/gear/reviews/audio_peluso_se_tube/
I wonder how many people who have A/B'ed the Peluso with a U47 conclude, as Barry did, that the difference between the two is almost imperceptible. That seems unlikely, since the only thing the mics share is a similar housing and grille. It may very well be a great mic, but c'mon, this "sounds-just-like-a-$10K-mic-for-under-$2K" hype is suspect.
"The music business is a cruel and shallow money trench, a long plastic hallway where thieves and pimps run free, and good men die like dogs. There's also a negative side."
- Hunter S. Thompson
http://www.myspace.com/steventoddhudson
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Peluso mics? [message #339958 is a reply to message #339956 ] |
Fri, 09 May 2008 03:20   |
Bruno Putzeys Messages: 562 Registered: November 2006 Location: Rotselaar |
Gold Member |
|
|
Klaus might chime in here but here's the little I know: omni mics (the single diaphragm variety at least) resonate at the top of the pass band. Ribbon mics resonate at the bottom of the pass band. Pressure gradient mics resonate right in the middle. The fundamental resonance is highly damped (otherwise bandwidth would be naught), higher order modes are not, if at all. They show up as distortion, not as response aberrations. It strikes me as impractical to try and tame these by ear only.
"Politically correct" is the politically correct term for "politically expedient lie".
|
|
|
|