| Passive Monitoring WITH a 31 band eq? [message #322911] |
Sat, 08 March 2008 23:17  |
 |
Cyclops Messages: 35 Registered: January 2005 Location: Long Beach, CA |
Member |
|
|
Hello all,
I am considering a coleman for monitoring instead of my Mackie board. Given the fact that I use an ART 31 band eq right before the amp for minor room correction, is passive monitoring even worth it? In other words, I'm wondering whether or not the mere presence of the 31 band eq would "un-passive" the monitoring chain in the first place..........or at least diminish any benefits I might have achieved by leaving the mackie behind for the coleman.
Thanks for any thoughts,
Jeff Reed
|
|
|
| Re: Passive Monitoring WITH a 31 band eq? [message #322934 is a reply to message #322911 ] |
Sun, 09 March 2008 05:20   |
|
get rid of the cheap 31 EQ..
read www.realtraps.com and ethan whiner comments about phase, frequencie and time domain..
"BORN A ROCKER, DIE A ROCKER"
"Do whatever pisses you off the least" - Jules
Standen, 2006
George Necola
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Passive Monitoring WITH a 31 band eq? [message #323046 is a reply to message #322911 ] |
Sun, 09 March 2008 16:07   |
 |
Larrchild Messages: 2677 Registered: June 2005 Location: Fort Lauderdale, Florida |
Platinum Member |
|
|
Room EQ is a fresh white tshirt on a shotgun wound, anyway.
The phase integrity gets lost in the EQ and you are worse than before.
Or, for digital EQ, "What,I have to go from A to D and back just to voice the room? Count me out!
Plus, you can pump another 10 dB of EQ at a room mode freq and it will get louder in the corner somewhere, lol, but it won't get any louder at the mix position.
I EQ with a saw, whenever possible.
Larry Janus
http://tubeequipment.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Passive Monitoring WITH a 31 band eq? [message #331282 is a reply to message #323046 ] |
Mon, 07 April 2008 09:37   |
David Kulka Messages: 459 Registered: January 2005 Location: Burbank, CA |
Active Member |
|
|
| Larrchild wrote on Sun, 09 March 2008 14:07 | ...for digital EQ, "What,I have to go from A to D and back just to voice the room? Count me out!...
|
For similar reasons, I wonder whether desks and monitor systems with digital outputs, and speakers with digital inputs will ever be popular. You'd be locked out of analog EQ, and bass management and nearfield options would get very messy. Digital monitoring would probably cost much more on the mixer side, another disincentive. Are monitor outs on consoles locked into analog for a long long time, even if other I/O's (except for mic pre ins) migrate to digital?
http://www.studioelectronics.biz
Service & Restoration of UREI dbx Eventide Marshall AMS Tube Gear and more
|
|
|
| Re: Passive Monitoring WITH a 31 band eq? [message #331394 is a reply to message #322911 ] |
Mon, 07 April 2008 15:56  |
 |
Larrchild Messages: 2677 Registered: June 2005 Location: Fort Lauderdale, Florida |
Platinum Member |
|
|
Probably when speakers have AES connectors, David.
Dual analog/digital outputs would still be needed though.
For our Time Modulators on the auxes..and such.=)
Larry Janus
http://tubeequipment.com
|
|
|